- This House Would Ban Gambling Debate
- This House Would Ban Gambling Free
- This House Would Ban Gambling Show
- This House Should Ban Gambling
- This House Would Ban Gambling Games
- This House Would Ban Gambling Game
- An abundant amount of laws promoting anti-gambling have also already passed such as the ban on gambling on ships in 1949, the Wire Act of 1961, in 1970, the prohibition of illegal gambling businesses, and in 1992 the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act. Gamblers know that The House always wins, and yet it is a risk they take.
- Oct 30, 2019 The Michigan House of Representatives passed sweeping legislation Wednesday that legalizes sports betting, internet gaming and gambling on.
- Lansing — The Michigan House voted overwhelmingly Wednesday evening to approve a bill loosening restrictions on Detroit’s three casinos as lawmakers seek to expand gambling options in the.
Responsible Gaming » Self-Exclusion Program ABOUT THE PROGRAM: For several years the casino members of the Iowa Gaming Association allowed a person to ban him/herself from a particular casino. In 2004, a Statewide Voluntary Self-Exclusion Program was created so a person could sign one form and not be allowed at any Iowa licensed casino. House of Representatives passed legislation on Tuesday that would ban most forms of Internet gambling and require banks to develop systems to block their customer's transactions to. Nov 21, 2019 Should gambling be banned or severely restricted? Or should casinos be encouraged? It is better to ban gambling to stop people getting started in the first place. Unlike drugs, gambling is not physically addictive. It is only psychologically addictive in some people. Gambling and casinos should be banned because it waste.
Good morning/ good afternoon everyone my name is John and today I would like to talk to you about Chris. Chris was a 23 year old man, who up until about 5 years ago lived a totally normal life. He lived an average childhood in an average house. At the age of 18 he moved out of his home to live in an apartment with his friends. On his 19th birthday his friends took him out for some fun, and that’s when everything changed.
They went to a casino, and for the first time since in his life, Chris made a bet, then a second, a third and a fourth.
Casino:UnibetLatest Bonus:Up to €100Bonus Type:1st Deposit BonusLatest Bonus Code:Not NeededActivation Link:.: Unibet Casino latest bonus might change according to your location.
Each time, thinking about all those ads he saw on TV and read in the paper growing up. He thought “wouldn’t it be great if I won something”. Little did he reaslise how unrealistic that scenario would be…and why not? It looked like people seemed to win everyday. (PAUSE) Just over 5 years later Chris committed suicide.
He was diagnosed with overwhelming depression due to an unpayable debt made by the gambling problem he developed all those years ago. You see, Chris grew up in an age where the advertising of gambling had no regulations.
Tattersalls and Intralot were able to advertise the splendor of gambling and Chris kept thinking he would win big. Then THE NEXT TIME would fulfill all his wishes. Then it became THE NEXT TIME would solve all his problems. Then he though desperately that THE NEXT TIME would pay off all his debts. Or THE NEXT TIME, or the next. He could not stop thinking that he was going to win. And how could he? He was only ever shown that he couldn’t lose, that the next time he would win…but he didn’t. He never did. I believe that the advertising of gambling in the media should be banned.
I am not here on a crusade against gambling itself, ill leave that to the politicians, I just want to talk about how we are allowing this disease to be so freely advertised in all forms of our media. In Australia over 70% of people gamble each year, and over 40% of these people gamble regularly, at least three or more times a week. The majority of these people are classified as problem gamblers, or ludomaniacs as the Australian Psychological Association has diagnosed them. People who still gamble despite devastatingly harmful and negative consequences.
Problem gamblers not only affect themselves, but all those around them as well, including their family members. This results into not only many broken Australian families but also it can ultimately lead to homelessness and like Chris, suicide. One in five suicides worldwide are related to gambling. One in five deaths I said. We are allowing the advertising of a franchise that leads to the deaths of 1 in 5 people EVERY DAY. Is this right? If we did stop all advertising of gambling this would be the first step in helping reduce Australia’s nation wide gambling problem.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics declared that in 2009 Australians lost over 15 billion dollars due to gambling. What is so sad is that the majority of these gamblers were aged between 19-24. The new generations that are turning 18 immediately turn to gambling as a form of entertainment because it has surrounded them all through their childhood. Jeff Kennett, former premier of Victoria recently said on 3AW that “there ISN’T a child today that ISN’T confronted with the concept that gambling is good. ” What is unfortunate is that as a country we are not doing anything to solve this problem.
Every child is exposed to this advertising at a young age, they are shown statistically unlikely events of people winning millions. This is creating the misperception that there is no downside to gambling, that these perfect scenarios happen all the time with no negative consequences. This is what in later years leads to the breakdown of families and even the suicides of the victims of gambling and gambling advertising. I ask you, why do we let these GREEDY, FACELESS companies get away with showing this POISON on TV?
This House Would Ban Gambling Debate
I’ve just talked to you about this problem our nation has, now let me tell you about another problem our nation faced and dealt with, that of the advertising of smoking. We forced the ban on the advertising of cigarettes and tobacco because of many factors, all of which are shared in common with gambling. They both posses immediate health risks such as stress and depression and they break up a lot of Australian families. Neither of the two are promoted by the Australian federal government due to their knowledge of their negative ramifications.
Furthermore, they are both known to be heavily addictive, requiring extensive management in the recovery of their victims. Also the cost of both tobacco and gambling is high, both financially and familial. They are both SO similar, but we have treated them SO differently. 95 % of the Australian public believes that cigarettes do more harm than good, so we banned the advertising of cigarettes. Well according to the ABS, 70% of Australians that think that gambling does more harm than good, so why have we done nothing about ITS advertising.
Why are we cracking down so hard on cigarettes, yet allowing nothing to be done about the advertising of gambling? It’s just not good enough! I’m sure that we have all seen those Tattslotto ads that depict the perfect dream scenario, or those guys at the TAB who go crazy when they win. Don’t get me wrong, I think they are well constructed ads, however they are essentially false advertising. They present an unrealistic idea of gambling. How many gambling ads have you seen of someone losing? Those ads would be more realistic as more people on bets, than they win.
It is actually more likely that you will die going to CASH IN your first division Tattslotto ticket than it is to actually win it in the first place. People may say to me that everyone already knows that they are not going to win. Then why do we even allow these corporations to publish these LIES in the first place? Why even allow these RIDICULOUS commercials to surround young children? Why are we encouraging something that we KNOW is wrong, that we know hurts us and is unrealistic and fake. Do we hate each other so much that we allow ourselves to be lied to and deceived?
It is up to the government now, to put an end to all this. It is up to Julia Gillard to help dramatically reduce the extraordinary sickness of our nation. The government will still receive their money from pokie machines and other forms of gambling regardless of the advertising, I’m sure of this. But how about somewhere along the way we stop cramming those ads into the Australian family home. Maybe we can stop some of the devastation from occurring by preventing our young being exposed to this. Maybe eventually prevent people from ending up like Chris.
Cite this page
Year 12 English oral gambling ban. (2017, Apr 27). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/year-12-english-oral-gambling-ban-essay
This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper from our expert writers
30-second summary
- Politician Lord Kirkhope says ban will protect children
- Problem gambling should be seen as a public health issue
- Kirkhope was behind push to ban TV ads in the 90s
- Says Labour government should not have liberalized sector
- Government already bringing in new measures to curb harm
Conservative politician renews push for ban
Lord Timothy Kirkhope, a Conservative politician, has renewed his drive to ban all gambling ads, everywhere. He said banning gambling advertisements was necessary to protect children.
Kirkhope has a seat in the House of Lords, the UK’s second tier of parliament. Addressing the Lords on January 16, he asked the government to clarify its current policy on gambling ads.
The politician was the House of Commons government minister for gambling matters in the Conservative government of the early 1990s. At that time, he wanted to ban gambling ads on TV but was unable to get the measure passed.
Says liberalization caused problems
This House Would Ban Gambling Free
Kirkhope claimed that the Labour government’s liberalization of the gambling sector led to today’s problems – record numbers of gambling addicts, including 55,000 children. The number of child gambling addicts has increased fourfold since 2016. It is estimated that 450,000 children aged 11-16 regularly gamble.
He said: “Sadly, in 2005 the Labour Government of that time totally liberalized this and we ended up with a great and continuing problem. We now have a total of £234m [$303m] of advertising revenue from gambling on television.”
Kirkham added that he was delighted that the gambling industry had volunteered to implement the new whistle-to-whistle ban on gambling adverts. But he said more needs to be done.
Government response
Lord Ashton, who has a role in the department for digital, culture, media, and sport (DCMS), pointed out that the government is dealing with problem gambling. TV ads must now carry warnings about the risks of betting, and the government is funding more clinics for gambling addiction.
The DCMS has also spent millions of pounds to educate consumers via its own advertising campaigns. And it pressured the gambling sector on the whistle-to-whistle ban.
Ashton said he wanted video gaming and app companies to be licensed to offer skins and loot boxes, where players can gamble for in-game prizes. For the most part, these cannot be converted into cash, but loot boxes are most frequently offered in games that appeal to children.
He said: “We are seeking to work with the video games industry to raise awareness of that and explore solutions. It is a new issue of which we are taking account.”
This House Would Ban Gambling Show
Currently, the UKGC has ruled that loot boxes are not a form of gambling but skin betting is, and an illicit one.
This House Should Ban Gambling
Kirkhope responded: “While I welcome the Government’s position and the way in which they are taking initiatives, including its whistle-to-whistle voluntary agreement, I am still very concerned that any review has no real timescale. Will my noble friend the Minister therefore give us some indication of whether there will be a timescale to a further review?”
This House Would Ban Gambling Games
A public health issue
Increasingly, gambling is seen as a public health issue because of the social harms caused by problem gambling. Politicians in both the House of Lords and the House of Commons are continuing to keep up the pressure on betting companies. Many believe gambling ads will end up being banned, much as cigarette ads are now illegal.
The DCMS and the regulator, the UK Gambling Commission, are working to limit the frequency of gambling ads beyond the whistle-to-whistle ban during live sporting events. Both parties are ready to impose ever bigger fines on betting companies who fail to act responsibly.
This House Would Ban Gambling Game
The government’s recent decision to fund more gambling addiction clinics has also been widely welcomed.